corboy,
I have rethought my response.
Given the number of LGAT's operating in the U.S. and the consistency of their approach, which seems to include the use of a standard set of hooks, the use of the name 'Harvard', or other tone'y university studies, the use of the APA's brand, I am thinking that the cited authorities could be in collusion with the culties.
Reputable scholars and clinicians really DO NOT like their names being attached to cheesy enterprises like LGAT's. All it takes is a phone call, or a letter from an attorney. That these individuals and institutions allow their names to be used in this way is quite shocking, when you think about it.
bakkagirl
I have rethought my response.
Given the number of LGAT's operating in the U.S. and the consistency of their approach, which seems to include the use of a standard set of hooks, the use of the name 'Harvard', or other tone'y university studies, the use of the APA's brand, I am thinking that the cited authorities could be in collusion with the culties.
Reputable scholars and clinicians really DO NOT like their names being attached to cheesy enterprises like LGAT's. All it takes is a phone call, or a letter from an attorney. That these individuals and institutions allow their names to be used in this way is quite shocking, when you think about it.
bakkagirl