corboy,
Agree 100% on the need to establish, or re-establish clear fiduciary duty in the field of coaching.
Your post also caused me to think back to the difference between monological, and dialogical relationships with stakeholders: end-users, buyers, coaches, and communities. These feedback loops have to be open for a field to correct itself.
Way TOO many personalities, gurus, TED TALKERS, academics who use their positions as entrepreneurial fiefdoms. Way too much brand building, and way too little sustainable practice building.
A media that has been wholly uncritical. Consumer watchdogs, individuals, and organization that have turned a blind eye.
Agree 100% on the need to establish, or re-establish clear fiduciary duty in the field of coaching.
Your post also caused me to think back to the difference between monological, and dialogical relationships with stakeholders: end-users, buyers, coaches, and communities. These feedback loops have to be open for a field to correct itself.
Way TOO many personalities, gurus, TED TALKERS, academics who use their positions as entrepreneurial fiefdoms. Way too much brand building, and way too little sustainable practice building.
A media that has been wholly uncritical. Consumer watchdogs, individuals, and organization that have turned a blind eye.
