Hi kdag
I think there's generally far greater awareness of the abuses among the public, and I would say that LGATs (because they go by different names) and because of the deliberate deception before attending are more hidden (they are often seen as unrelated). I do understand, and respect, your decision... but Landmark and Co seem to be a little more cautious than KR when it comes to things that will lead to that sort of "take-down". Their strength is in their secrecy and in the lack of easily-observable harm (they are not branding members and they've hidden their 'god' to some degree since 1991). Since they aren't as reckless, I don't see this ultimate take-down happening in court, where sleazy lawyers can twist the truth.
I think there's generally far greater awareness of the abuses among the public, and I would say that LGATs (because they go by different names) and because of the deliberate deception before attending are more hidden (they are often seen as unrelated). I do understand, and respect, your decision... but Landmark and Co seem to be a little more cautious than KR when it comes to things that will lead to that sort of "take-down". Their strength is in their secrecy and in the lack of easily-observable harm (they are not branding members and they've hidden their 'god' to some degree since 1991). Since they aren't as reckless, I don't see this ultimate take-down happening in court, where sleazy lawyers can twist the truth.