SomewhereInMiddleAmerica;
The questions asked don't require any in-depth knowledge of Landmark or first hand personal association with its founder Erhard.
If Landmark is an effective way to resolve personal issues through its training why didn't it work for the creator of the Forum Werner Erhard?
And if Landmark's claim that it substantially improves people's lives is true why not prove that by funding a scientific study published in a peer review journal?
The most obvious answers to these two questions is that Landmark's programs don't work that well, as demonstrated by Werner Erhard's life subsequent to his epiphany that forms the bases for Landmark training, and the total lack of any meaningful objective scientific evidence to support such claims.
Why would anyone seriously interested in a meaningful discussion on this message board attempt to avoid addressing those two very basic questions?
The questions asked don't require any in-depth knowledge of Landmark or first hand personal association with its founder Erhard.
If Landmark is an effective way to resolve personal issues through its training why didn't it work for the creator of the Forum Werner Erhard?
And if Landmark's claim that it substantially improves people's lives is true why not prove that by funding a scientific study published in a peer review journal?
The most obvious answers to these two questions is that Landmark's programs don't work that well, as demonstrated by Werner Erhard's life subsequent to his epiphany that forms the bases for Landmark training, and the total lack of any meaningful objective scientific evidence to support such claims.
Why would anyone seriously interested in a meaningful discussion on this message board attempt to avoid addressing those two very basic questions?