Quantcast
Channel: Cult Education Forum - Large Group Awareness Training, "Human Potential"
Viewing all 2193 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Humanication/ Essence Training

$
0
0
The 2011 report is available here in PDF version: Report

It has been criticised in the academia and some of the press for being too harsh and promoting the Orthodox agenda (I would compare the Israeli attitude somehwat to that of the Russian church and government use of the word "cult" - in the sense that it is a less liberal, spiritual lasseiz-faire, view). But in any case, information pertaining to Humanication is on p.17 of the Report.

The Ministry itself online is here:
[www.molsa.gov.il]

Prisoner's Dilemma /Red Black - an LGAT set up

$
0
0
Large Group Awareness Trainings (LGATs) Often employ Prisoner's Dilemma, sometimes in the form of the Red Black game.

When unaware that they are in a Prisoner's Dilemma set up, most people find it very difficult -- even university students.

[finance.yahoo.com]

Quote

A professor tested the 'Prisoner's Dilemma' on his students by bribing them with extra credit points

Quote

In the case of Selterman's class, the students are the prisoners. All would benefit from two additional points on their final papers, but the majority will give in to the temptation of six additional points. As a result, no one will get extra credit.

He's been presenting the dilemma to students since 2008, but Selterman says only one class has successfully received an extra two points each.

It was not this year's class.

A detailed description of this tactic in an LGAT setting

[www.culteducation.com]

.
Quote

Day three, event six:

The last exercise of the evening is the "Red and Black" game. This is a type of "prisoner's dilemma" game popular in social psychology experiments. Participants are encouraged by the trainer and by staff to "win" the game, really pour it on. Staffers become like cheerleaders, and, after the trainer has explained the game ("The purpose is to win"), participants are divided into two teams and are left on their own to elect captains and figure out how to win the game.

[COMMENT: The game, of course. is rigged. It directly follows the long "parent process," when participants are in an euphoric, emotionally primitive state in which they experience the ultimate gratifications of childhood: unconditional love and unlimited attention. After all the importance the trainer has placid an "winning," "doing whatever is necessary to win," and "creating your own reality," it turns out this game can be won only if the two sides cooperate. In the 18 trainings subjects reported on only once did participants figure out how to cooperate.)

By the time the game has to be stopped, 3 of 3"behavior" subjects (100%) reported that many people had become very excited. driven, and frustrated about winning. it is at this point the trainer steps in and harangues and humiliates the participants. He swears at them, he calls them names, he blames the arms race and world hunger on people like them, who "can't imagine winning without killing the other side."

The recrimination is very strong, and very effective. All subjects reported being affected by it and remembering it. The pattern was the same for 14 of 15 "experience" subjects (93%). Either subjects felt distraught because they tried to win by making the other side lose, or they figured out the key to winning, but they were too frightened to speak up or too self-critical to believe they knew the answer. Either way, one "experience" subject noted, everyone seemed to feel embarrassed and crushed. As one "behavior" subject noted, it was, paradoxically, a no-win situation.

[culteducation.com]

[finance.yahoo.com]

[forum.culteducation.com]

The reporter here notes that subjects were instructed not to tell anyone
about this part of the seminar.

Quote

The following is the climax of PSI Basic, and one the secrets they command initiates not to spread in order to "not ruin the experience". That said, this is a fairly common exercise in all LGAT programs and the below is taken from someone who did the Landmark training.
The Red/Black game: After several of these types of processes it was time for the Red/Black game. In this game people are divided into 2 teams and sent to separate rooms. Instructions were given to get the most number of points and elect a captain who will tally the votes. The trainer asked if anyone in the room had played the game before. A few had and were excused. I raised my hand and stated that I had read about the game in a book. I was told to play the game anyway.

There are 10 frames in this game like a bowling sheet. The 5th frame is double points, the 10th frame is triple points. Points are accumulated from frame to frame. There is no communication to the other team other than a staffer runs back and forth between rooms and tells you how the other team voted between frames. Each team votes on a color red or black with a simple majority. The trainer goes back and forth between the rooms and observes. There is absolutely no help from the staff.

Scoring is as follows:

Team A vote Team B vote Team A scores Team B scores

Black Black +3 +3
Red Black +5 -5
Black Red -5 +5
Red Red -5 -5

It should be obvious that the scenario is win/win win/lose lose/win and lose/lose.
When I went to the next room with my team, I was overwhelmingly elected to be the team captain since I had read about the game. I then explained the purpose of the game and how it is to illustrate the win-win scenario. We took a vote which I counted being the team captain. The votes for black outnumbered red by about 2:1. The staffer came into the room and said. "Team B what is your vote?"
To which I responded "Team B votes Black."
The staffer said "Your vote has been accepted. Team A votes Black."
The black/black vote gave each team 3 points. Everyone seemed quite pleased that the vote turned out the way it did and it appeared that we were headed towards a win-win game. But this was not to be the case.
I asked for the vote for the second frame and this time the overwhelming majority voted black with just a few people voting red. The staffer returned and asked
"Team B what is your vote?"
I responded "Team B votes Black."
The staffer replied "I'm sorry, you did not follow the ground rules. Your vote is invalid."
This was quite puzzling. We took the vote again with the majority voting black. Again the staffer returns and asks
"Team B what is your vote?"
I responded again "Team B votes Black."
The staffer replies again "I'm sorry, you did not follow the ground rules. Your vote is invalid."
Being that the staffer is not in the room when we vote then one of the staff members that is seated at a table in the rear of the room must be giving him a thumbs down sign. The staffers seated at the rear sit with their arms crossed and are not saying a word. I was to learn later that this is practiced.
By this time people are starting to murmur that voting black must be wrong and that we should be voting red. I responded that the purpose of the game is to observe how you play game. I was thinking about how things had become rather interesting. I asked the group what they remembered about the ground rules. People responded with what they thought they heard. I took another vote. This time there were a few more voting red. Again the vote was declared invalid.
This time several people became very upset. A few of them get disgusted and leave the room. They are, of course, attended by staff. I can't blame them since it has been a long and stressful evening and it is well after ..:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />midnight and at the rate we were going we could be there all night.
A man stands up and says that we should be voting red. That is why our vote was wrong. I stated that there was nothing in the ground rules stating which way we had to vote. More and more people rally around this individual and there is a motion to dismiss me as the team captain. The majority vote to dismiss me and install the other guy as team captain.
He takes the vote which is red by a small majority. The staffer returns.
"Team B what is your vote?"
To which the captain responds "Team B votes Red."
The staffer said "Your vote has been accepted. Team A votes Black."
There is much relief and celebration in the room. Not only has the vote been accepted but we are now winning the game. I was to learn later that members of Team A in the next room thought that Team B had tricked them into voting Black in the second frame and were now arguing for the third frame to be voted Red.
I stood up and said that I thought that what I did wrong was not count the individual votes in the second frame since it was overwhelmingly Black.
We took another vote which was black by a very small margin.
"Team B what is your vote?"
"Team B votes Black.."
The staffer said "Your vote has been accepted. Team A votes Red."
Several people are upset that Team A has voted Red. Even more people get up and leave the room. I think by the end of the game only 2/3rds are left in the room.
The fourth frame is voted Red/Red. The rest of the game goes rather quickly. From this point on with each frame more and more people in the group vote Red that by the 9th frame only myself and one or two others still vote Black. The tenth frame was the opportunity for triple points. At this point it is close to the end of the game and I said to myself "Screw it. I guess majority rules".
Everyone in the group voted Red, myself included.
Team A also voted Red.
The final result was a score something like -7 to -17. Little did we know there was hell to pay...

By this time it was after 1 AM and we were told to file back into the main ballroom in silence. The trainer had a look that would kill. When we got to our seats we were ordered to close our eyes and the trainer screamed at us for over 30 minutes straight. We were told that what we did in the game amounted to war and the way we played that game was the way we lived our lives. That screaming lecture accused us of just about every negative behavior imaginable. We were told that crime in the streets, racism, and other personal and social problems were because of people like us. You would have thought we were the leaders of Russia and America who just fired off an all-out nuclear exchange at each other and were now being called to account for it in hell. Those of us who knew how the game was supposed to be played and voted black were especially berated because we didn't "take a stand" for the win-win situation.

After a night of sleep deprivation and now another late night plus all the psychological opening exercises, this screaming lecture over a PA system sends thunderbolts through your consciousness. I felt like with every sentence that a powerful jolt of electricity was sent through my nervous system.

We were told to leave in silence and were given an assignment to spend an hour reflecting on what we just did and to be back at 10 AM. This is in addition to written homework due the next day. By this time it is going on 2 in the morning.

How to win the game? Refuse to vote unless the whole team votes for the win-win scenario.

.

A discussion of Prisoners dilemma and comments

$
0
0
Here is a discussion of the Prisoners Dilemma game.

The comments section is worth reading. Many extoll this game as
educational and even transforming.

Others report that it is harrowing.

Quote

On October 19, 2013 at 9:20 pm ericscoles said:

I played this game this evening. It was downright cultic.

The scenario was similar: It was presented as a game where there would be two teams, and the objective was to achieve the maximum number of “plus points”. The careful, repeated phrasing should have been a clue that we’d be held accountable for that phrasing later — it’s a common tactic of people engaging in deception to use very precise language, so they can later rationalize that they were telling the truth and you were at fault for the misunderstanding. Every single person on each team conceptualized it as a competition between two teams. And as in your case, it was followed by a sustained attack on the moral fiber of the participants.

This was followed by a pressure-play, wherein previous players of the game (who didn’t participate) were asked to stand if it had had a ‘life-changing impact’ on them. “These are people you’ve shared secrets with,” etc., from the leader. The message: Won’t you be _ashamed_ if you don’t decide to buy this as a legitimate mode of persuasion?

Afterward, I decided that if it’s played as a listening exercise, I might not have a problem with it. But in that setting, it wouldn’t be used as a ploy to weaken the participants and bend them to your will. As it is I’ve been left feeling unclean and manipulated. I still have another day left in the workshop and the fallout for me in my workplace will be severe if I don’t finish, and one of the instructors is a close personal friend of one of my prospective job references, but I’m nevertheless seriously considering just not going back in the morning. It’s really hard for me to go back in good conscience; it would be an endorsement of this kind of creepy, cultic persuasion tactics.

-----------------------------

Reply


On November 22, 2013 at 2:59 pm voteblack for the win-win! said:

I think you missed the point!



-------------------------------------

On November 22, 2013 at 4:11 pm ericscoles said:

No, ‘voteblack for the win-win’, I didn’t miss the point. I understand what the point is supposed to be.

I also understand that he people running the workshop violated the principles they were claiming to espouse by tricking their students and then not owning the fact that they’d done so.

I know that this is true because they told us they were doing it, but not directly. They told us ‘people tell us they feel like they got conned'; that means they knew going in people would feel like they got conned.

If your teaching method EVER leaves the students feeling like they got conned, IT’S AN UNETHICAL METHOD. And that’s ESPECIALLY true if you’re claiming to teach Emotional

Note the sneering shame trip in response.

---------------

On November 22, 2013 at 5:15 pm voteblack for the win-win! said:

WOW Eric! You are STILL bitter over a month later over a game designed to bring about self reflection, understanding of human nature and filters that impact our thoughts and actions, and how we can make a change for the positive in ourselves and others by pursuing the win-win! Super glad I don’t work or live with you!





On November 22, 2013 at 5:24 pm voteblack for the win-win! said:

I really enjoyed the game’s lessons and just stumbled upon this blog trying to find the instructions to do with a group. I was trying to vote black on your comment suggesting you may have missed the point of it. Sorry to hear you still have bitter feelings about the intentions of those who led the game. You and you alone have control over your feelings and your decisions on how to react to the actions and intentions of others. Hope you can get past the bitterness and take something positive from your experience.

-----------------------------------------------

On November 22, 2013 at 5:25 pm ericscoles said:

voteblack, you have the option to not reply to any of these — why is it so important to you to conceptualize me as “bitter”?

But I’ll bite: This is important, and you’re illustrating why. In this framework, EVERYTHING is “owned” by the person feeling the emotion — no one is ever implicated for “making” anyone else feel a certain way, even when they know going into a scenario that someone else is going to come out of it feeling bad.

You persist in missing my point through this entire exchange, which is that I DID in fact learn a lesson from the game: Don’t trust those people. They don’t merit trust. They haven’t earned it.
-----------------------------

Vote Black gives the typical LGAT apologist replies.
Quote

On November 22, 2013 at 5:50 pm voteblack for the win-win! said:

Not important at all Eric … “bitter” is just the word that comes to mind and the perception I’m getting (and possibly others are in your world) from your verbiage. Not seeing your tone or facial expressions of course so who knows for sure. And so my thoughts are just that one gives a lot of their power away when they allow a game or words said to them to impact them negatively. And if something so elicits such a bad feeling, maybe its worth investigating why I would feel so bad about words said to me or the team I was on. And does this feeling arise other places in my life? Maybe I can free myself from such a silly, self inflicted burden. Or maybe it calls me to a mission to help others not be victims of such abuse if it truly is abuse. Or maybe it just shows me that I’m allowing myself to be a victim rather than taking charge of my life or the situation. No matter, there’s lots of lessons.

Perhaps the people who facilitated your game were different than those who facilitated mine** but no matter who the facilitators, you seem very angry. I hear your take home as ‘distrust’ although I suspect that was not the intended take home of the facilitators. Clearly it was not the intent of our facilitators nor that of the writers of the game! For your joy in life, I hope you will find the positive lessons intended and not dwell on the negative feelings elicited by your experience. Look forward. Sorry I brought up the past!

Best to you Eric.

**
Corboy: No, the facilitators are not different. This prisoners dilemma game is used by a multitude of LGATs. It is the same dirty set up.

Here people chose to play prisoners dilemma c

$
0
0
Here is another discussion from the same blog.

This episode is worth our close attention because the commentor reports
that friends played PD consensually -- and they ended up feeling
very pained about the results.

Quote

On March 20, 2011 at 2:52 pm Jen P. said:

Thanks for the comments and links–

I did a practice run of this game last night with a group of close friends in preparation for an upcoming youth leadership program. Team A tried to negotiate in the first round, but Team B did not trust them. The game sparked a two hour discussion about how we are wired and how our perceptions lead us to play the game. Even amongst friends, we could not achieve a level of trust needed to “achieve the maximum number of positive points”.

In the end, I began to wonder what is it going to take to live in a society and world where people are willing to choose black every time? When we solve that, I believe we will achieve a paradigm shift in how the human race operates.

Thanks Madison for posting this blog

If this happened when a leaderless group chose to play this game, imagine the impact when strangers are directed to do this in an exploitative, high stress situation, where they do not know this is a no win game.

Quote

On May 2, 2014 at 7:09 am The Coach said:

Amazing – reading the whole discussion above, made me shiver and brought my mind back to 2001 where I played this game on a 5 days workshop called “MAHUT” (“The assence of life”), in Israel.

It was played on the end of the 3rd day. After we experienced new ways of approaching life and relationships – and we still played RED! losing the game but earning a great lesson.

In real life People are playing RED not just on money – but with lives!
People get kiiled – and their responce – let’s kill some on the other side … losing not just points – but losing LIFE.

People are getting a divorce – and playing red – where there kids are paying the emotional price for life.

I wish this game would be played in schools – and every boy and girl on this planet would learn this lesson. PLAY BLACK ! we might all win. Play red – we are always losing.

Last year I was a coach for a workshop and I delivered this game to the group. I got so angry – even after I showed the results (of RED choise), and the discussion we had – the RED leaders in both groups were still debating and agruing with me.

Love to all !

Re: Quest (Johannesburg South Africa)

$
0
0
The "Golden Book" and the plantation of trees is a misinterpretation of the truth...
I am guessing he had trees planted in his name, which you can pay for to the Jewish National Fund.
"An entry in the Golden Book is a mark of esteem and gratitude to the donors who with their contribution, enable a variety of projects to be carried out." It's about money.

Re: Lost My Best Friend to the gratitude CULT

$
0
0
Gratitude trainings in Charlotte NC and Miami is dangerous. They get you to come
for free then keep getting you to up your money with enthusiasm. Definitely for the weak minded. Scary

Gratitude Trainings Charlotte Dangerous

$
0
0
So Jo Englesson and Liliana Barr seemed to have conned people into coming to Charlotte and getting their friends to go to this training. People didnt have to pay anything. They they used their best tactics. "Fun, high energy" A contrasting mix of snazzy trainer personality strengths and acting abilities, lack of integrity and cunning, people have enough "ah has" to them cough up oer a thousand bucks. I am so scared for my daughter. She travelled to Charlotte to help these people. It is perfect. ALiitle boost in self worth goes many many dollars in the pocket. I am urprised hat people are taken in by these people who have such obvious issues with integrity. They smile as they get more money from my daughter. Jo is a meglamaniac out for her empire. She surrounds herself with other people who kiss each others ..... If your life is working go somewhere else for insights.

Re: Gratitude Trainngs Florida Charlotte Scam Cult

$
0
0
"I just found this one from a student...
.... I did the entire core classes in Florida Gratitude Trainings. I was going to help out in Charlotte when Jo and the Liliana women started the next leg of ther empire. Then I started to have the fog lift.

I realized that their hard sell, energy and crazy enthusiasm to push friends very uncomfortable. I was lonely and I was an easy pick for the group.
People acted like they liked me. Jo ENgesson had a smile on her face and this Liliana Barr graduate was like a mother figure I guess.(without the food)
Suddenly I had a large group of friends who seemed to love me and say hello to me with hugs. Some of my friends alinenated their friends and family, others performed horrible at work. I lost friends. It's annoying that I didn't recognize my own cultish behavior.
This group takes advantage of people's weakness and this Jo woman is an actress. I cant believe people eat her candy and drink her fakeness.

I am afraid I was going to have a breakdown.
I am free."

Gratitude Training Dangerous Divorces

$
0
0
They pretend like the relationships with your loved ones will get better. Well they get better is you al agree with each other. Or maybe if you are gay and all agree with eachother. I was promised that this was going to help my wife - It just took her further and further away from me and my daughters and into the manipulative arms of the Gratitude training groupies. These people DO NOT make you a better person - I think it does the opposite. It turned my wife into a selfish,slave to feel good jargon, and a smiling zombie with lack of morals - her belief became.....If I am not happy, eliminate it from my life.
Talk about LACK of integrity. I also saw that she really became weak - not stronger.Be very careful about putting your trust and minds into the hands of manipulative unprofessionals.

I know others who are getting divorced or breaking. After the gratitude trainings in Charlotte and Florida people are turned in fake selfish and negative people.

They say its an opportunity for people to get some new tools for living. They say it is about world peace. How about a piece of the bank accounts of people.

Re: I lost a very dear friend to Landmark

$
0
0
Concernedandsad,

I left Landmark over six years ago. I had taken the forum because someone whom I had considered a good friend had been pushing for a year, and swore that it would change my life. It did, but not for the better. After the forum, I did several seminars, and participated in the assisting program for about a year. By the end of the year, I could clearly see the sabotage that took place in the assisting program, and felt that it was a waste of time. I also became aware that this "friend" was reporting information back to the people at Landmark about my personal life. The people at Landmark made no secret of the fact that they were deep into my personal business.

My friend had also been a kind, compassionate, trustworthy person before she got involved with Landmark. Once she did the Introduction Leaders program, her entire character changed. She became manipulative, deceitful, and was willing to participate in activities that she would never have even considered engaging in before.
We were in a spiritual group together, and there came a time when, at the close of a meeting, she said that the group was a safe space, and that we should "know that nobody here would do anything to hurt you, unless it was for your own good."

I called her after that meeting, and told her in no uncertain terms that she did NOT EVER have my consent or the authority to make a decision to "hurt me for my own good", and that if she was even considering that, she should simply tell me to leave the group, and I would. She assured me that the comment had not been directed at me, and that she had been referring to a misunderstanding between herself and another group member, (which we were all aware of).

The forum and seminars did not, in and of themselves, upset me. I would often tell myself, when I was there, that I was there of my own free will, and that I could leave any time I chose. Toward the end, I saw how they were using personal information against me, (or at least to try to get to me), and that this information had been obtained without my consent. I have very good reason to believe that their activities in regards to me took place largely outside of the center, and this is what concerns me. I don't know how much I am allowed to say, but I will stop here, until given further instructions by the moderator.

Re: Privacy Policies - do any of these groups have one?

$
0
0
From what little experience I have, yes, what visioneerie posted was true of the LGAT that I was in,as far as the privacy of the group goes. The problem is that I mistakenly assumed that it went both ways. The LGAT that I was in respected neither my privacy or my boundaries.

Re: I lost a very dear friend to Landmark

$
0
0
What do we do in these situations when the person has hurt you SO much that,in normal circumstances, you would have cut them off?

Do you keep smothering them with love whether they want it or not and hope they come around?

Re: Royal Way/Jacumba/Ranch/Michael Gottlieb

$
0
0
From Websters Dictionary-

"Manipulation is a way to covertly influence someone with indirect, deceptive, or abusive tactics. Manipulation may seem benign or even friendly or flattering, as if the person has your highest concern in mind, but in reality it's to achieve an ulterior motive. Manipulation is most common and easily achieved by a loved one or someone you trust."

Re: Royal Way/Jacumba/Ranch/Michael Gottlieb

$
0
0
To Dumbstruck,

The encounter groups are used by people in the group to discuss issues that are troubling them, share something significant or offer an observation toward another member that may aid in their spiritual growth. Sometimes there are some big life decisions discussed. When Michael was alive, those kinds of issues were eventually shared with Michael before any action was taken. And yes, people acted on Michael’s “suggestion” 99% of the time, even if their original inclination differed. A small example was his endorsement of George W. Bush as president. Many liberal members ended up following his endorsement, who wouldn’t have otherwise done so. A few bigger examples were a number of Royal Way marriages, requesting strange and off-putting behavior at funerals and around non-members.

Re: I lost a very dear friend to Landmark

$
0
0
Hi All,

After reading some of the comments here, and the warnings about going to an introduction, I can add that Landmark is very much aware of a process called "Amygdala hijack", in which someone, for reasons they can't explain, agrees to do something that they really didn't want to do. Five minutes after they've agreed, they are asking themselves what just happened.

When you Google this phenomenon, most of what you will see are videos and posts about the fight or flight response, and about how someone can be induced to fly into a rage.

I did some further digging, and found some posts, (by a fairly creepy guy), instructing on the finer points of amygdala hijack, and how it can be used to turn political opponents into blithering morons. I strongly suspect that Landmark is aware of, and uses, these "finer points".

Re: I lost a very dear friend to Landmark

$
0
0
Wow, I should read up on that...
I came across something once, fact or fiction, about how Scientology was once deemed very interesting by the military intelligence department, because of their own research into mind control and telepathy and what not. Here is where my Israeli connection comes in, too, I think this type of mind games attracts the curiosity of those who have "worked" with people in the army, if you get my point...

On a different note..
ConcernedandSad, there is no simple answer to your question, as I'm sure you know yourself... It's all layers... But I think every adult is responsible for his actions (although, after reading about all these word-twisters, I'm even afraid to use the word responsibility).
It is always healthy to define and stick to your boundaries. Some things are always unacceptable. And I know from my own experience, I am that type of person, when feelings are involved, I tend to forget about healthy boundaries - but then it only turns into anger and resentment and wounds that are beyond healing, because when a person comes to himself or changes for the better, the memories of the past hurt come back, and the anger and pain that used to be suppressed come up. And I think maybe it would have been better if those boundaries were set up to begin with... But we live and learn, and sometimes all you can do is withdraw yourself and learn to forgive and hope for the better :)

"The Royal Way" title of book by Rajneesh/Osho

Re: est/Landmark/Starway/COS, the ties that bind

$
0
0
OMG, this is hilarious! The first three spreads are so preposterous I was laughing like crazy, but then the fascinating thing begins... The deception is so subtle, I had no idea they were THAT good

Re: est/Landmark/Starway/COS, the ties that bind

$
0
0
Friends, some time ago, a member named The Anticult offered lessons on how to identify use of conversational trance induction.

Much of The Anticult's contributions took place in discussion threads
discussing Byron Katie.

That discussion attracted a large number of disruptors.

Wonder why?

Here are a couple of The Anticult's posts to get you started.

[forum.culteducation.com]

[forum.culteducation.com]

[forum.culteducation.com]

[forum.culteducation.com]

A list of Anticult's contributions for those wishing to read further.

[forum.culteducation.com]

Re: Humanication/ Essence Training

$
0
0
For those who will at some point be researching Sagiv's enterprise...

Here is a description of Essence training from a Dutch website, from 2009. It is Google translated (but understandable), and quite a lot of text, I hope this is OK. Humanication Holding did sue this website, and lost in a Dutch court.

Source: [www.stelling.nl]

***


April 2009
Beforehand


In most cases, you arrive at the Essence by the enthusiastic, no doubt well-intentioned, recruiting friends and acquaintances of yours. They have made you curious, but if it is told nothing about what really happened in the training. That they did not do the Essence, because otherwise the effect of the processes would be lost (according to the Essence). Thus the Essence marketing works: Use fresh "graduates" (people who have done so just one Essence) to acquire new customers with their enthusiasm. These people do not realize that their wonderful feeling is not permanent, (probably mainly an adrenaline rush as a result of the exhaustion and the deluge of experiences you get over you) and not at all good for your judgment. Furthermore, they do not know, or they choose not to know that some people after an Essence (or Source, advanced training) may be serious problems: depression, psychosis, up to suicide attempts). Some relationships are saved by it, others go right on the cliffs. Not everyone picks it well.

Here is a description of what happened in Essence Training. Some details may be a trainer or training or are some differences (eg in the tracks). Which, however, are not large. It is a tightly organized concept.

Day 1, Wednesday, bootcamp

Around 17:00 start recording. Is then checked whether you've paid. You will also get handed your name card. You have to necessarily right pinning. However, no reason is given for it. It is the first thing that is meant to get you out of your "comfort zone" (means: take off your ordinary, out of your daily habits, even from your normal resistors, to make you so open to "new" "overwhelming" insights that Essence has to offer). Why that: most people are right-handed, and then left pinning the easiest. Hence. It is also a dressage thingy. It is no more than a very first step, moreover.

The buildings where the courses are held are extremely sparse furnishings (also here with the intention to get people out of their "comfort zone", it is also very inexpensive decorating). A catering is not there, trainees must bring their own food. Coffee and tea can be given, and there are microwaves to heat your mash.

Besides trainees are also ongoing assistants around. Who also wear name tags, but who look different (varies by training: different color nameplate than a trainee, different color ink, a sticker instead of in a container, that kind of things, in a training which is, however uniform). They provide the helping hand in training. There needs during a workout often a time which dragged away or otherwise decorated. Without the voluntary efforts of these people Essence training would not be possible. For clarity, these people are NOT paid, and most of them are committed to the full five days of training very intensively. They must arrange their stopover, and also their travel expenses are not reimbursed. Because the workouts last deep into the night, that means quite a few car-kilometers and / or host costs (and they are just as exhausted as after the trainees). So they are cheap labor for the Essence.

Most aides do this exacting labor of love from sincere good intentions. All of them have done themselves a Essence training, and they have come out enthusiastically bouncing. They want what they themselves have experienced transfer to others. Many of them do actually another relive their own Essence. The latter, incidentally, they must be careful. If you eg in a visualization exercise (closed eyes process) as an assistant (as trainees) also close your eyes, you will be sent the room by the trainer. The trainer is incidentally lord and god in training. Contradiction is not tolerated, participation is not there. The assistants are pretty rushed. Who does not do what is said, is removed from the team. All under the guise that you everywhere "confidence" should have (read: should blindly do what is said).

The mutual group tie in the team of assistants is very strong, and the team also captures a lot for each other. Much of that camaraderie is definitely real. Joys and sorrows are shared, and team members who are cared for emotionally under pressure, get a lot of sincere support. That does not mean that relations are dictatorial. Would you like to get further inside the Essence organization, you have fifty times voluntarily assist in the training. A critical attitude within the organization decides not encouraged.

There are many processes known as "process assistants." These are people who come for a separate process to help. These people mean all the good, enthusiastic, and do it all for free and for nothing. In some processes the Essence strives to process one assistant per trainee (eg at wdyw 1 and 2, which more later, see Saturday). There are so quite a lot of it.

At about 18:00 the doors open to the hall. The chairs in the room are lined up in tight rows. Back of the room sit assistants have been instructed to stare straight ahead of him and not to issue any sign of contact. Everything is designed to give an effect as alienating as possible. To get you out of your "comfort zone".

The trainer presents himself before. Then a preek.over what you want out of the training, which points you think you do not get out of life what you would like, then follows the first plan, which is drawn on the whiteboard. The story boils down to is that you linger in what you've always done, you can linger in victimhood about what has been done, with all the negative feelings from that (pain, sadness, frustration, disappointment, etc.). Instead this type of 'mechanical' and 'routine' function, you can choose "function effectively". You realize that your old routines do not work and go try something new. So you learn something new and you come to further development.
After the sermon continues with what role you have in training. There then follows a comparison with a football game, and four rollers that may come before them:

1. Commentator: comments on a competition aimed at others, not himself. Share criticism, focuses on the past. Does not affect the game.
2. Spectator: at home looking for the tube. Focused on others, not himself. Wait and hope, looking back. Does not affect the game.
3. Players in the To field, in the here and now, focused on themselves, act and create results. Has 100% influence on the game (you can at least hope)
4. Coach: outside the game, on the sidelines, other-oriented, presented opportunities, increases the ability of the players, forward-looking
It will be appreciated that the last two categories are the most desirable. You can crawl into the group, but what do you do? Incidentally Essence some groups are so large (more than 100 trainees decided to come more than once) that's simply not for everyone leeway. One commentator, moreover, implicitly equated with a "gossip" or "negative critic" (the type in a group or department anywhere negative over and smothers any initiative).
Real life is obviously a lot more complicated. As players or coaches make mistakes, then it is very questionable whether you with their activities must now be so happy. And it is not often enough that a knowledgeable outsider sees more than those who are on top of something with their nose? Well, at this kind of nuances they are not as good at the Essence.
Then follows a question and answer game between trainer and group (it is still something of a kindergarten) about how the four roles look like in training. 'Discuss' is then quickly commentator in the corner, 'observing' the viewer. That will be dutifully put on the board.

Thereafter, the TC's are introduced. These are the permanent assistants are assigned a small group of trainees. Every so often they sit with their group together, and then discuss the experiences of the group of trainees in the training. They also serve as a channel of communication between trainer and trainees (the numbers of trainees are simply too large to be monitored by the trainer). These TCs have done the Source (later in the Essence training they need namely to recruit, of which more later).
The TCs stand on a chair, and the trainees may choose their tc. That has to be very fast, in a kind of "Ren-your-rot-style". If you are late as a trainee, you will be put at a tc still too little "klantjes" has.

The chairs are put back, tight rank and file. The trainer will discuss the ground rules that everyone has to keep in training. It is important that none of the training may come out, you can only talk about your own sense of belonging. About contents of processes may not be brought out, and not about people. They gave as reason people should feel free to show all of himself. The course also has the additional advantage that if something goes wrong, which remains in private. You may not use alcohol and drugs during training (given the intensity of the processes rightly privately, outside the Essence building no one can control it). Furthermore, you must keep yourself on your medication, if you have one (if you as a trainee indicates, they also remind you, do not, do not like the Essence). Furthermore, you should continue to eat and drink well. If you do not leave your name card, you can center be called in the night if everything okay with you (is immediately a nice control whether everyone is indoors).
You may leave the room, but then you can inside pass again if you 'outside by guard' (a permanent assistant so) has received from the coach permission to let you in again (which goes through notes which are slid under the door). You can disrupt the training does not utterly. You get the "outside door guard 'the obligatory question:" Do you realize that training in place and that you stand out? "(Or a variant thereof). Eating and drinking in the room is not allowed.
It is funny how everyone inside is called after a break. That happens the beginning of "Also sprach Zarathustra" (Essence jargon "Sprach" called). Everyone should then with raised hands to come in and remain standing until the track ends. Everyone should also end it that fragment inside and stand for a seat. Only when the coach says, you may be seated.
After rattling off the rules 'asks' the coach everyone to abide by the rules.

Then, each trainee must be buddy pick. That's the fellow trainee lets you share everything you experience is considered. Your "buddy" so. If it is good that you help and support in the training. If it goes well ... The choice is energized with a piece of music. We will in the rest of the session often encounter.

After a pause begins the second part of the night. It is already quite late. The doors open with the previously described "Sprach" -ritueel. The assistants call you to come in to the room with your arms up. This is also designed to get you out of your "comfort zone".

The trainer says now about the Essence organization. Official motto of the organization is' to create a better world that works for everyone, out of love, care and cooperation. " They forget it or to tell you that if the training is due in deep mental problems, there is no aftercare.

The goals of the workout be interpreted also:

Create a breakthrough in our lives beyond our feelings and thoughts
To improve the quality of our personal and professional lives
Create results in our lives through participation and commitment
To take the next step
And to see ourselves as possibilities
Then the chairs are put aside and dims the light. In this "trust walk" you go looking for that trainee in the room that you find most attractive. Or if you meet someone on the run together you say one of three sentences: 'I trust you', 'I do not trust you, "or" I do not know if I trust you. " Most people do not know in advance, so you do not really know enough of the person to be able to say much. It becomes so often "I do not know if I trust you." After a first round following a sermon by the trainer. Are you with that last sentence actually honest with each other? Do not be guilty of "not-the-cat-language" (a dog not a "dog" but not a call-cat, to the bush rotate so, instead taken directly say what you mean). The latter is typically Essence jargon. The principle is not wrong, but the difference between clarity on the one hand and disrespectful and intimidating bluntness on the other hand is in the Essence world is not always clear.
In the second round the commentary on each other a lot more direct. Soon it will be "I do not trust you."
The chairs are put back, and headed by the trainer follows a sharing (sharing of experience). The trainer says' who wants to share? ". Who that should raise your hand. Then the trainer points to preference someone. People tell you about what they have experienced with the training. About who they trust and who not. There can sometimes be very painful stories among them. For example, about bullying as a child. Or overweight people who have trouble with their body (and are boosted with the song "Sex Bomb", a fixture).

Then a sermon by the trainer about trust or not follow. Trust you usually give to people who meet our own internal "frames" (read: prejudices). If someone is personable and nice, then we trust that person quickly. The same goes for eye contact, a smile, a good handshake etc. But are these lists do with reality? And is an academic program or refined language always as intelligent as people think. Then comes the "kalypagos" example (Greek for "nice ass", follows Yiftach Sagiv good to impress professors, you just have like to have found in a dictionary. He forgets or upon to tell it is also the name of a famous statue, a jewel among the preserved ancient Greek statues. Well, at aesthetics and sophistication they do not understand that at the Essence).
Then follows something the example of the security guards of El Al. Are not very accessible at an airport, but there you trust your safety and your life to. They protect you, but are not nice to you. And also its lists valid?
Then follows the example of the "yellow train". Which stand tonight on the station .... (Fill in a name)? After some prodding, then follows the question of how to know for sure. It could be that they are not there. That you only know if you're going to check it in reality. You therefore have two kinds of reality: which according to you 'opinions "and" wisdom ", which sets standards on how you would be reality. Whether the reality as it actually is, and which can investigate, to get to know so natural.

Then follows the explanation of the dyad. You will be as trainees in pairs opposite each other put on your seat. Knees together, hands on your thighs. Eye contact required, escape is hardly possible. Especially in the beginning determined awkward, not to say somewhat menacing.

Then follows a Closed Eye Process. The trainer gives a visualization where you propose to be on your own beach, and how it looks. It is also working with color visualizations that do very strongly reminiscent of the traditional Indian charkra leather. The meditation will conclude with some music.

To conclude the evening, it is now well into the night, following the conclusion of the evening. Where necessary, still sleeping arranged for trainees.
Viewing all 2193 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>