Obviously, I don't disagree with anything you say.
That said, you may want to explain to me why all of these 'geniuses' in the academy have ignored the fact that Erhard's LGAT (I consider him/'est' synonymous with every organization he spawned, including Landmark) are dangerous, and have never been shown to deliver measurable 'positive' results.
I would suggest, too, that the issue with LGAT entails more than the delivery of these programs by un-trained facilitators. This assumes that "sensitivity training", "encounter groups", "T-groups" delivered by psychologists are safe and are[ in some way efficacious. I guess that research would have to entail, too, delivery of these interventions in a corporate context.
Please show me the research that supports this, if you can find it.
Bakkagirl
That said, you may want to explain to me why all of these 'geniuses' in the academy have ignored the fact that Erhard's LGAT (I consider him/'est' synonymous with every organization he spawned, including Landmark) are dangerous, and have never been shown to deliver measurable 'positive' results.
I would suggest, too, that the issue with LGAT entails more than the delivery of these programs by un-trained facilitators. This assumes that "sensitivity training", "encounter groups", "T-groups" delivered by psychologists are safe and are[ in some way efficacious. I guess that research would have to entail, too, delivery of these interventions in a corporate context.
Please show me the research that supports this, if you can find it.
Bakkagirl